Some parts, such as the Granger-Kerr chemistry is better than the book. The book was exciting and fun to read, though I probably would have enjoyed it a little more had I read it first before the movie. I found that the movie version I loved from the first followed the plot pretty well, except for maybe some scenes removed to make for better film-length comprehension. This book is not terribly long or hard to get through. It’s been years for me to get around to it, and I was a little bit afraid that the book would let me down in comparison. In fact, I believe it was one of the first titles I ever entered into my To-Read notebook that I wanted to make sure I read the novel of someday. There was something about the swashbuckling adventure full of danger, intrigue, cloak and dagger, and romance that really had me at hello.

I was staying at my grandpa’s and watched it over and over. My Book Review: This story became an immediate favorite years ago when I first saw the old 1952 film version (starring Stewart Granger and Deborah Kerr) when I was 15 years old. When the rival to the throne, Black Michael of Strelsau, attempts to seize power by imprisoning Elphberg in the Castle of Zenda, Rassendyll is obliged to impersonate the King to uphold the rightful sovereignty and ensure political stability.” Rassendyll bears a striking resemblance to Rudolf Elphberg who is about to be crowned King of Ruritania. Plot Summary: “Anthony Hope’s swashbuckling romance transports his English gentleman hero, Rudolf Rassendyll, from a comfortable life in London to fast-moving adventures in Ruritania, a mythical land steeped in political intrigue.

The prisoner of zenda by anthony hope